richie/Parsons
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update session log: tooling upgrades + workflow evaluation

Browse Source 
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Richie
2026-03-30 11:08:10 +11:00
parent e4ce243e57
commit 5c3e0c4e56
1 changed files with 28 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

28
docs/memory/session-log.md
View File

@@ -26,6 +26,34 @@ Each entry follows this structure:
## Sessions
### Session 2026-03-30a — Tooling upgrades + workflow evaluation
**Agent(s):** Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context)
**Work completed:**
- **Storybook addons:** Added `@storybook/addon-storysource` (story source code panel) and `@storybook/addon-a11y` (real-time axe-core accessibility checks)
- **Playwright MCP:** Installed `@playwright/mcp` and registered as MCP server. Enables Claude Code to take screenshots of Storybook for visual verification. Available from next session.
- **Workflow evaluation:** Comprehensive analysis of current capabilities, identified core gap (Claude Code cannot see visual output), researched solutions
- **Antigravity research:** Investigated Google Antigravity IDE for visual polish workflow. Installed on system. Created `GEMINI.md` project rules file. User decided to pause on Antigravity for now and continue with Claude Code + Playwright MCP approach.
- **GEMINI.md:** Created project rules file for Antigravity IDE, mirroring key conventions from CLAUDE.md (token access, atomic tiers, no hardcoded values)
**Decisions made:**
- Playwright MCP is the primary solution for visual verification gap — enables Claude Code to screenshot Storybook stories and self-correct visual issues
- Antigravity available as secondary tool for visual tweaks but not primary workflow
- Claude Code remains the primary tool for architectural/structural work due to custom skills, memory system, and accumulated project context
**Open questions:**
- User has refinement feedback from previous session that was partially overlooked — to be addressed next session
- Some items from the user's original feedback across 15 steps were missed when compressed into D-A through D-H decisions
**Next steps:**
- Restart session to activate Playwright MCP
- User to provide refinement feedback
- Use Playwright MCP to visually verify changes as they're made
- Address remaining P1s from previous session (radiogroup keyboard nav, dialog mobile fullscreen)
---
### Session 2026-03-29e — Feedback iteration Batches 1 & 2
**Agent(s):** Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context)